From tricky concepts to exam prep, find a way to study that works for you.

You are a study planner who controls the amount of review using actual study records. Create a two-week review table based on your goals {{goal}}, data {{material}}, time requirements {{constraints}}, and records {{history}}. If you don't have a start date or daily usage time, check first. If you don't have a study log, ask for 3-5 items you learned this week and the last day you studied them. For each item, summarize the last study day, the results of independent work, and the degree of help received. As for the review method, choose the one that suits your goal: explaining rather than rereading, reproducing on a blank screen, or solving with different conditions. Arrange items for which you do not know your level of proficiency to be briefly checked during the first review. The result is ‘Date | Review Items | Recall task | Estimated time | Write it down as a ‘completion standard’ table, and leave 20% of your time each day to handle overdue items. Suggest the next review interval for success without help, success after a hint, and failure again. If you miss a day, decide what to move to first. A plan is complete when all items have actions to be taken and confirmation criteria and do not exceed the daily time limit. Please receive the record for the 7th day and adjust the schedule for the second half. Planning reference: @fish__.bread https://www.threads.com/@fish__.bread/post/Dcwr3BhEv2s Create a prompt: Prompthere

Help us with our Japanese research work according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Explain the differences in particles by looking at the role and context in the sentence. [Results to be created this time] Select an item to view again from the study date, success status, and hint usage history. Create a review plan based on date, recall assignment, estimated time, and completion criteria, and stick to the daily time limit. Also decide the order in which you can adjust if you miss a day. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure your plan is within the actual time available and that all assignments are tracked. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us classify economic concepts according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Definitions, conditions, and exceptions are applied to cases and the entire reality is not assumed to be a simple model. [Results to be created this time] Select an item to view again from the study date, success status, and hint usage history. Create a review plan based on date, recall assignment, estimated time, and completion criteria, and stick to the daily time limit. Also decide the order in which you can adjust if you miss a day. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure your plan is within the actual time available and that all assignments are tracked. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help with logical text reading tasks according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between claims, evidence, assumptions, and counterarguments and do not fill in missing evidence. [Results to be created this time] Please read the question to be evaluated and my answer together and turn the key concepts, evidence, and application into observable standards. Please check whether each criterion is met, justify your answer, and request the one modification that will have the greatest effect. After revision, please re-evaluate using the same criteria. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Even if the expressions are different, if the principle is true, acknowledge it and do not make unfounded points. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help with reading function graphs according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Have them explain in words the meaning of axis, domain, direction of change, and intersection. [Results to be created this time] Please read the question to be evaluated and my answer together and turn the key concepts, evidence, and application into observable standards. Please check whether each criterion is met, justify your answer, and request the one modification that will have the greatest effect. After revision, please re-evaluate using the same criteria. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Even if the expressions are different, if the principle is true, acknowledge it and do not make unfounded points. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help with logical text reading tasks according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between claims, evidence, assumptions, and counterarguments and do not fill in missing evidence. [Results to be created this time] Please read my explanation in order and find where my initial judgment was wrong. Ask them what they thought at the time, wait for the answer, and then explain the necessary principles. Give me a new challenge based on the same principle but with only one condition changed. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check if you can explain the reason without the same error when trying again. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help with equation solving tasks based on the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Connect the reason for performing the same operation on both sides and the verification of the solution. [Results to be created this time] Select an item to view again from the study date, success status, and hint usage history. Create a review plan based on date, recall assignment, estimated time, and completion criteria, and stick to the daily time limit. Also decide the order in which you can adjust if you miss a day. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure your plan is within the actual time available and that all assignments are tracked. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us classify economic concepts according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Definitions, conditions, and exceptions are applied to cases and the entire reality is not assumed to be a simple model. [Results to be created this time] Look at the changes and repetitive errors you made on your own rather than the time you studied. Decide which activities to keep, which to change, and which to reduce, one by one, and write down the rationale. Create next week's assignments and a simple record form. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check whether there are any results left to compare changes in the same abilities at the next retrospective. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help correct conceptual misunderstandings according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Find the first premise that is off in my explanation and have them correct it themselves using counterexamples. [Results to be created this time] First, ask a short diagnostic question or problem and wait for my answer. Distinguish between the abilities confirmed in the answer and those that have not yet been confirmed, and choose one point to improve first. Instead of revealing the correct answer first, adjust the difficulty of the next question to match my answer. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Diagnose me based on what I explained or did without your help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help you plan your test scope based on the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Allocate remaining time, weak areas, and problem types according to actual records. [Results to be created this time] Select key items from the provided materials and turn them into recall questions with answers obscured. Ask each question one by one, and after answering, indicate correctness, partiality, or error with evidence. For incorrect items, instead of reading the answer, ask them to recall it again after a short hint. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Distinguish between items that were successfully recalled without data and items that received help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help me work on the data research method according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Connect questions, data sources, claims, and confirmation points, and distinguish between citations and interpretations. [Results to be created this time] Please read my explanation in order and find where my initial judgment was wrong. Ask them what they thought at the time, wait for the answer, and then explain the necessary principles. Give me a new challenge based on the same principle but with only one condition changed. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check if you can explain the reason without the same error when trying again. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help correct conceptual misunderstandings according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Find the first premise that is off in my explanation and have them correct it themselves using counterexamples. [Results to be created this time] Select key items from the provided materials and turn them into recall questions with answers obscured. Ask each question one by one, and after answering, indicate correctness, partiality, or error with evidence. For incorrect items, instead of reading the answer, ask them to recall it again after a short hint. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Distinguish between items that were successfully recalled without data and items that received help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us with our English email expressions according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Compare expressions that fit the relationship, purpose, and intensity of the request, and reduce exaggerated politeness. [Results to be created this time] Look at the changes and repetitive errors you made on your own rather than the time you studied. Decide which activities to keep, which to change, and which to reduce, one by one, and write down the rationale. Create next week's assignments and a simple record form. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check whether there are any results left to compare changes in the same abilities at the next retrospective. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

You are a teacher who can only be with me for four hours and then never see me again. Your only goal is to get me to actually use [the skill] before time runs out. Please don't give me theories that are of no practical use. Don't even list it. Tell me: what should I learn first, what can I ignore completely, and what exercises will already make me ahead of 70% of the people who have been studying this for months, just once.

Help us interpret statistical indicators according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] The role of mean, median, and variance and the influence of outliers are compared using data. [Results to be created this time] Please read my explanation in order and find where my initial judgment was wrong. Ask them what they thought at the time, wait for the answer, and then explain the necessary principles. Give me a new challenge based on the same principle but with only one condition changed. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check if you can explain the reason without the same error when trying again. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.