Prompt
Help me work on the purchase logic counterexample according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: I want to resolve the blockage in the buy logic counterexample and decide on my next course of action. Resources to review: Investment hypothesis and supporting data Conditions and Constraints: Please proceed based on the provided data, and mark any missing facts as requiring confirmation. Previous attempts and records: This is my first attempt. Please proceed from the parts that can be confirmed in the current data. [Key points to check in this topic] Find conditions and indicators to confirm that the hypothesis is incorrect, and do not conclude with a trading instruction. [Results to be created this time] Please adjust the period, currency, calculation method, and inclusion range of the comparison target. For items that cannot be directly compared due to different standards, please write down the reason and any necessary adjustments. Explain the differences and conditions to check rather than superiority or inferiority or trading actions. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure that the same definition applies to all comparison boxes or that differences are specified. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.