Quality grade: defaultDescriptive grading criteria, understand in my own wordsHelp me work on the descriptive grading criteria according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Check the essential concepts, evidence, and logical connections rather than matching the expression of the correct answer. [Results to be created this time] Please check my explanation first, and then explain only the necessary principles with everyday examples. Please let me know where the analogy doesn't fit and ask questions so I can explain it again. Provide additional examples only where you misunderstood. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please make sure my explanation distinguishes between definitions, conditions, and application examples. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.
Quality grade: defaultEnglish listening review, try to understand my own wordsPlease help me with my English listening review according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between sounds, connections, pronunciation, vocabulary, and blockages in understanding content. [Results to be created this time] Please check my explanation first, and then explain only the necessary principles with everyday examples. Please let me know where the analogy doesn't fit and ask questions so I can explain it again. Provide additional examples only where you misunderstood. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please make sure my explanation distinguishes between definitions, conditions, and application examples. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultKey summary of the book, understand it in my own wordsHelp me summarize the key points of the book according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between the author's claims and my own impressions and check the evidence for each chapter. [Results to be created this time] Please check my explanation first, and then explain only the necessary principles with everyday examples. Please let me know where the analogy doesn't fit and ask questions so I can explain it again. Provide additional examples only where you misunderstood. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please make sure my explanation distinguishes between definitions, conditions, and application examples. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultGeometric proof, the next task in this studyHelp me with my geometric proof work according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Separate the given conditions from the conclusion to be proven and check the basis for each step. [Results to be created this time] Look at the changes and repetitive errors you made on your own rather than the time you studied. Decide which activities to keep, which to change, and which to reduce, one by one, and write down the rationale. Create next week's assignments and a simple record form. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check whether there are any results left to compare changes in the same abilities at the next retrospective. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultApplying data research methods and conditions even when they are differentHelp me work on the data research method according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Connect questions, data sources, claims, and confirmation points, and distinguish between citations and interpretations. [Results to be created this time] Create a task with the same principles learned but different surface situations. Let me decide first what conditions are the same and what has changed. Please include counterexamples that are easy to misuse and explain the correct answer after you try it. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure you explain why you chose the principle and the limitations of its application in the new situation. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultChoosing an English article, trying to understand it in my own wordsHelp us select English articles according to the goals and resources below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Have them explain the reasons for their choice based on specificity, shared information, and countability. [Results to be created this time] Please check my explanation first, and then explain only the necessary principles with everyday examples. Please let me know where the analogy doesn't fit and ask questions so I can explain it again. Provide additional examples only where you misunderstood. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please make sure my explanation distinguishes between definitions, conditions, and application examples. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultPython loop, determine review order with recordsHelp with Python loop work according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] It tracks the repetition range, state change, and termination conditions and predicts the result before execution. [Results to be created this time] Select an item to view again from the study date, success status, and hint usage history. Create a review plan based on date, recall assignment, estimated time, and completion criteria, and stick to the daily time limit. Also decide the order in which you can adjust if you miss a day. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure your plan is within the actual time available and that all assignments are tracked. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultTypes of previous exam questions, from this study to the next assignmentPlease help me with my previous exam questions according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Group questions into problem demands and solution principles, and count the frequency of questions only from confirmed data. [Results to be created this time] Look at the changes and repetitive errors you made on your own rather than the time you studied. Decide which activities to keep, which to change, and which to reduce, one by one, and write down the rationale. Create next week's assignments and a simple record form. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check whether there are any results left to compare changes in the same abilities at the next retrospective. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultEnglish listening review, applying even under different conditionsPlease help me with my English listening review according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between sounds, connections, pronunciation, vocabulary, and blockages in understanding content. [Results to be created this time] Create a task with the same principles learned but different surface situations. Let me decide first what conditions are the same and what has changed. Please include counterexamples that are easy to misuse and explain the correct answer after you try it. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure you explain why you chose the principle and the limitations of its application in the new situation. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultPractice speaking English, practice with small resultsHelp you with your English speaking practice tasks according to the goals and resources below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] After my answer, I only give feedback on the meaning and key errors and have them repeat it. [Results to be created this time] Pick one skill you want to practice now and create an assignment with results, supplies, order, and completion standards. Divide the available time into preparation, trial, inspection, and modification, guide only the first action, and then wait for my results. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check accuracy, applicability, and explanability with actual submissions. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultPractice speaking English, evaluate based on your answersHelp you with your English speaking practice tasks according to the goals and resources below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] After my answer, I only give feedback on the meaning and key errors and have them repeat it. [Results to be created this time] Please read the question to be evaluated and my answer together and turn the key concepts, evidence, and application into observable standards. Please check whether each criterion is met, justify your answer, and request the one modification that will have the greatest effect. After revision, please re-evaluate using the same criteria. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Even if the expressions are different, if the principle is true, acknowledge it and do not make unfounded points. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultIntensive study plan, applied even under different conditionsHelp me work on my learning focus plan based on the goals and resources below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Connect observed distractions to actionable study units and do not assume will. [Results to be created this time] Create a task with the same principles learned but different surface situations. Let me decide first what conditions are the same and what has changed. Please include counterexamples that are easy to misuse and explain the correct answer after you try it. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure you explain why you chose the principle and the limitations of its application in the new situation. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultComparing world history, determining review order with recordsHelp us compare world history according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Set the same comparison axis and period range and distinguish similarities, differences, and limitations. [Results to be created this time] Select an item to view again from the study date, success status, and hint usage history. Create a review plan based on date, recall assignment, estimated time, and completion criteria, and stick to the daily time limit. Also decide the order in which you can adjust if you miss a day. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure your plan is within the actual time available and that all assignments are tracked. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultTest Scope Planning, Explained in My Own WordsHelp you plan your test scope based on the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Allocate remaining time, weak areas, and problem types according to actual records. [Results to be created this time] Please check my explanation first, and then explain only the necessary principles with everyday examples. Please let me know where the analogy doesn't fit and ask questions so I can explain it again. Provide additional examples only where you misunderstood. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please make sure my explanation distinguishes between definitions, conditions, and application examples. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultEquation solving, the next task in this studyHelp with equation solving tasks based on the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Connect the reason for performing the same operation on both sides and the verification of the solution. [Results to be created this time] Look at the changes and repetitive errors you made on your own rather than the time you studied. Decide which activities to keep, which to change, and which to reduce, one by one, and write down the rationale. Create next week's assignments and a simple record form. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check whether there are any results left to compare changes in the same abilities at the next retrospective. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultPractice project, practice thinking without lookingHelp us work on our hands-on project according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Match the results to be created, practice skills, supplies, and completion standards to the available time. [Results to be created this time] Select key items from the provided materials and turn them into recall questions with answers obscured. Ask each question one by one, and after answering, indicate correctness, partiality, or error with evidence. For incorrect items, instead of reading the answer, ask them to recall it again after a short hint. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Distinguish between items that were successfully recalled without data and items that received help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultPython loop, understand it in my own wordsHelp with Python loop work according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] It tracks the repetition range, state change, and termination conditions and predicts the result before execution. [Results to be created this time] Please check my explanation first, and then explain only the necessary principles with everyday examples. Please let me know where the analogy doesn't fit and ask questions so I can explain it again. Provide additional examples only where you misunderstood. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please make sure my explanation distinguishes between definitions, conditions, and application examples. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultInterpretation of scientific experiments, the next task in this studyHelp us interpret scientific experiments according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between independent, dependent, and controlled variables and observation and inference. [Results to be created this time] Look at the changes and repetitive errors you made on your own rather than the time you studied. Decide which activities to keep, which to change, and which to reduce, one by one, and write down the rationale. Create next week's assignments and a simple record form. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check whether there are any results left to compare changes in the same abilities at the next retrospective. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultConnecting Korean history events and determining the order of review through recordsPlease help me connect Korean history events according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Divide the viewpoint, background, events, and results and confirm the causal basis between events. [Results to be created this time] Select an item to view again from the study date, success status, and hint usage history. Create a review plan based on date, recall assignment, estimated time, and completion criteria, and stick to the daily time limit. Also decide the order in which you can adjust if you miss a day. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure your plan is within the actual time available and that all assignments are tracked. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultConnecting Korean history events, finding the point where I got stuckPlease help me connect Korean history events according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Divide the viewpoint, background, events, and results and confirm the causal basis between events. [Results to be created this time] First, ask a short diagnostic question or problem and wait for my answer. Distinguish between the abilities confirmed in the answer and those that have not yet been confirmed, and choose one point to improve first. Instead of revealing the correct answer first, adjust the difficulty of the next question to match my answer. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Diagnose me based on what I explained or did without your help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultInterpretation of scientific experiments, practice recalling without lookingHelp us interpret scientific experiments according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between independent, dependent, and controlled variables and observation and inference. [Results to be created this time] Select key items from the provided materials and turn them into recall questions with answers obscured. Ask each question one by one, and after answering, indicate correctness, partiality, or error with evidence. For incorrect items, instead of reading the answer, ask them to recall it again after a short hint. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Distinguish between items that were successfully recalled without data and items that received help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultUse proportional formulas, apply even under different conditionsHelp us work on using proportional formulas according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] First find the quantity and unit being compared and check the conditions for proportionality to be established. [Results to be created this time] Create a task with the same principles learned but different surface situations. Let me decide first what conditions are the same and what has changed. Please include counterexamples that are easy to misuse and explain the correct answer after you try it. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure you explain why you chose the principle and the limitations of its application in the new situation. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultDescriptive grading criteria, applied even under different conditionsHelp me work on the descriptive grading criteria according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Check the essential concepts, evidence, and logical connections rather than matching the expression of the correct answer. [Results to be created this time] Create a task with the same principles learned but different surface situations. Let me decide first what conditions are the same and what has changed. Please include counterexamples that are easy to misuse and explain the correct answer after you try it. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure you explain why you chose the principle and the limitations of its application in the new situation. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultPractice remembering chemical equations without looking at themHelp me work on chemical equations according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Check the conservation of the number of atoms and the meaning of the coefficients, and find the reaction conditions in the data. [Results to be created this time] Select key items from the provided materials and turn them into recall questions with answers obscured. Ask each question one by one, and after answering, indicate correctness, partiality, or error with evidence. For incorrect items, instead of reading the answer, ask them to recall it again after a short hint. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Distinguish between items that were successfully recalled without data and items that received help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt