Quality grade: defaultSelect English Articles, Evaluate Based on My AnswerHelp us select English articles according to the goals and resources below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Have them explain the reasons for their choice based on specificity, shared information, and countability. [Results to be created this time] Please read the question to be evaluated and my answer together and turn the key concepts, evidence, and application into observable standards. Please check whether each criterion is met, justify your answer, and request the one modification that will have the greatest effect. After revision, please re-evaluate using the same criteria. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Even if the expressions are different, if the principle is true, acknowledge it and do not make unfounded points. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.
Quality grade: defaultInterpreting probability situations, evaluating based on my answersHelp us with the task of interpreting probability situations according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between sample spaces, events, and conditions and do not arbitrarily assume independence. [Results to be created this time] Please read the question to be evaluated and my answer together and turn the key concepts, evidence, and application into observable standards. Please check whether each criterion is met, justify your answer, and request the one modification that will have the greatest effect. After revision, please re-evaluate using the same criteria. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Even if the expressions are different, if the principle is true, acknowledge it and do not make unfounded points. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultPhysical force analysis, understand it in my own wordsHelp us with our physical force analysis tasks according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between object, force, direction, and unit, and find points where motion and force are confused. [Results to be created this time] Please check my explanation first, and then explain only the necessary principles with everyday examples. Please let me know where the analogy doesn't fit and ask questions so I can explain it again. Provide additional examples only where you misunderstood. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please make sure my explanation distinguishes between definitions, conditions, and application examples. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultPractice speaking English, step by step with hintsHelp you with your English speaking practice tasks according to the goals and resources below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] After my answer, I only give feedback on the meaning and key errors and have them repeat it. [Results to be created this time] Please give me one task that I can solve at my current level. When I make a request or show a blocked part, I give hints one by one in the following order: direction, intermediate inspection, and core principles. Don't give complete answers all at once, but decide the next steps after each attempt. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please separately record the steps you received a hint from and the steps you performed on your own. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultCorrecting conceptual misunderstandings, from this study to the next taskHelp correct conceptual misunderstandings according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Find the first premise that is off in my explanation and have them correct it themselves using counterexamples. [Results to be created this time] Look at the changes and repetitive errors you made on your own rather than the time you studied. Decide which activities to keep, which to change, and which to reduce, one by one, and write down the rationale. Create next week's assignments and a simple record form. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check whether there are any results left to compare changes in the same abilities at the next retrospective. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultAdjusting review intervals, practicing recalling without lookingHelp me adjust the review interval according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] The next review is based on the last study day and the results of unassisted recall. [Results to be created this time] Select key items from the provided materials and turn them into recall questions with answers obscured. Ask each question one by one, and after answering, indicate correctness, partiality, or error with evidence. For incorrect items, instead of reading the answer, ask them to recall it again after a short hint. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Distinguish between items that were successfully recalled without data and items that received help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultSolving equations, finding where I'm stuckHelp with equation solving tasks based on the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Connect the reason for performing the same operation on both sides and the verification of the solution. [Results to be created this time] First, ask a short diagnostic question or problem and wait for my answer. Distinguish between the abilities confirmed in the answer and those that have not yet been confirmed, and choose one point to improve first. Instead of revealing the correct answer first, adjust the difficulty of the next question to match my answer. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Diagnose me based on what I explained or did without your help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultPython loop, correcting your initial mistakeHelp with Python loop work according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] It tracks the repetition range, state change, and termination conditions and predicts the result before execution. [Results to be created this time] Please read my explanation in order and find where my initial judgment was wrong. Ask them what they thought at the time, wait for the answer, and then explain the necessary principles. Give me a new challenge based on the same principle but with only one condition changed. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check if you can explain the reason without the same error when trying again. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultRecall of memorized items, practice recalling without lookingHelp you recall memorized items according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Rather than reading it again, have them answer while covering their eyes and record any incorrect items. [Results to be created this time] Select key items from the provided materials and turn them into recall questions with answers obscured. Ask each question one by one, and after answering, indicate correctness, partiality, or error with evidence. For incorrect items, instead of reading the answer, ask them to recall it again after a short hint. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Distinguish between items that were successfully recalled without data and items that received help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultComparing world history, understanding it in my own wordsHelp us compare world history according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Set the same comparison axis and period range and distinguish similarities, differences, and limitations. [Results to be created this time] Please check my explanation first, and then explain only the necessary principles with everyday examples. Please let me know where the analogy doesn't fit and ask questions so I can explain it again. Provide additional examples only where you misunderstood. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please make sure my explanation distinguishes between definitions, conditions, and application examples. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultReview English listening, step by step with hintsPlease help me with my English listening review according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between sounds, connections, pronunciation, vocabulary, and blockages in understanding content. [Results to be created this time] Please give me one task that I can solve at my current level. When I make a request or show a blocked part, I give hints one by one in the following order: direction, intermediate inspection, and core principles. Don't give complete answers all at once, but decide the next steps after each attempt. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please separately record the steps you received a hint from and the steps you performed on your own. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultInterpreting study records and applying them even under different conditionsHelp me interpret my study records according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Separately compare the study time and the results and help provided by independent work. [Results to be created this time] Create a task with the same principles learned but different surface situations. Let me decide first what conditions are the same and what has changed. Please include counterexamples that are easy to misuse and explain the correct answer after you try it. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure you explain why you chose the principle and the limitations of its application in the new situation. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultDeciding the order of review by interpreting and recording scientific experimentsHelp us interpret scientific experiments according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between independent, dependent, and controlled variables and observation and inference. [Results to be created this time] Select an item to view again from the study date, success status, and hint usage history. Create a review plan based on date, recall assignment, estimated time, and completion criteria, and stick to the daily time limit. Also decide the order in which you can adjust if you miss a day. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure your plan is within the actual time available and that all assignments are tracked. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultReading logical text, practicing thinking without lookingHelp with logical text reading tasks according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between claims, evidence, assumptions, and counterarguments and do not fill in missing evidence. [Results to be created this time] Select key items from the provided materials and turn them into recall questions with answers obscured. Ask each question one by one, and after answering, indicate correctness, partiality, or error with evidence. For incorrect items, instead of reading the answer, ask them to recall it again after a short hint. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Distinguish between items that were successfully recalled without data and items that received help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultStudy concentration plan, find where I am stuckHelp me work on my learning focus plan based on the goals and resources below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Connect observed distractions to actionable study units and do not assume will. [Results to be created this time] First, ask a short diagnostic question or problem and wait for my answer. Distinguish between the abilities confirmed in the answer and those that have not yet been confirmed, and choose one point to improve first. Instead of revealing the correct answer first, adjust the difficulty of the next question to match my answer. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Diagnose me based on what I explained or did without your help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultReading logical text, finding where I am stuckHelp with logical text reading tasks according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between claims, evidence, assumptions, and counterarguments and do not fill in missing evidence. [Results to be created this time] First, ask a short diagnostic question or problem and wait for my answer. Distinguish between the abilities confirmed in the answer and those that have not yet been confirmed, and choose one point to improve first. Instead of revealing the correct answer first, adjust the difficulty of the next question to match my answer. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Diagnose me based on what I explained or did without your help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultJapanese research, try to understand in my own wordsHelp us with our Japanese research work according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Explain the differences in particles by looking at the role and context in the sentence. [Results to be created this time] Please check my explanation first, and then explain only the necessary principles with everyday examples. Please let me know where the analogy doesn't fit and ask questions so I can explain it again. Provide additional examples only where you misunderstood. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please make sure my explanation distinguishes between definitions, conditions, and application examples. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultOrganizing essay answers, practicing with small resultsHelp me compose my essay answer according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Connect the question request, key claim, evidence, and counterargument within the length. [Results to be created this time] Pick one skill you want to practice now and create an assignment with results, supplies, order, and completion standards. Divide the available time into preparation, trial, inspection, and modification, guide only the first action, and then wait for my results. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check accuracy, applicability, and explanability with actual submissions. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultDetermine review order based on past question types and recordsPlease help me with my previous exam questions according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Group questions into problem demands and solution principles, and count the frequency of questions only from confirmed data. [Results to be created this time] Select an item to view again from the study date, success status, and hint usage history. Create a review plan based on date, recall assignment, estimated time, and completion criteria, and stick to the daily time limit. Also decide the order in which you can adjust if you miss a day. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure your plan is within the actual time available and that all assignments are tracked. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultEnglish sentence structure, applying even under different conditionsHelp you work on English sentence structure according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Find the subject, verb, and modifier range and check for misreading points in Korean word order. [Results to be created this time] Create a task with the same principles learned but different surface situations. Let me decide first what conditions are the same and what has changed. Please include counterexamples that are easy to misuse and explain the correct answer after you try it. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure you explain why you chose the principle and the limitations of its application in the new situation. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultJapanese research, correcting your initial misconceptionsHelp us with our Japanese research work according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Explain the differences in particles by looking at the role and context in the sentence. [Results to be created this time] Please read my explanation in order and find where my initial judgment was wrong. Ask them what they thought at the time, wait for the answer, and then explain the necessary principles. Give me a new challenge based on the same principle but with only one condition changed. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check if you can explain the reason without the same error when trying again. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultPython loop, practice with small resultsHelp with Python loop work according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] It tracks the repetition range, state change, and termination conditions and predicts the result before execution. [Results to be created this time] Pick one skill you want to practice now and create an assignment with results, supplies, order, and completion standards. Divide the available time into preparation, trial, inspection, and modification, guide only the first action, and then wait for my results. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check accuracy, applicability, and explanability with actual submissions. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultSQL query basics, review order based on recordsHelp with basic SQL query tasks according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between filter, group, and join result units. [Results to be created this time] Select an item to view again from the study date, success status, and hint usage history. Create a review plan based on date, recall assignment, estimated time, and completion criteria, and stick to the daily time limit. Also decide the order in which you can adjust if you miss a day. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure your plan is within the actual time available and that all assignments are tracked. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt
Quality grade: defaultUnderstanding Excel functions, practice recalling without lookingHelp us understand Excel functions according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Check the meaning of input range, reference method, empty value, and error handling. [Results to be created this time] Select key items from the provided materials and turn them into recall questions with answers obscured. Ask each question one by one, and after answering, indicate correctness, partiality, or error with evidence. For incorrect items, instead of reading the answer, ask them to recall it again after a short hint. [Working Principle] Rather than explaining the answer, aim to be able to do it on my own. If you don't have enough data, ask only what you need, and don't record that you completed exercises you didn't do. The first response only guides me to the action I need to take at that stage. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Distinguish between items that were successfully recalled without data and items that received help. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.Copy prompt