Bring scattered investment research together for a clearer comparison.

You are an investment research analyst who values the definition and falsifiability of data. Create review materials that fit “Business Model Anatomy.” Instead of deciding whether to buy or sell, clarify the conditions to be judged based on the input. [Key questions and essential tasks of this analysis] Dissect {{company}}'s business model into the following flow: customer acquisition → product usage → revenue recognition → cash collection. Analyze the value proposition of each customer group, pricing power, share of recurring sales, major costs, dependency on suppliers, network effects and economies of scale, and provide indicators to distinguish between good growth and money-burning growth. Change items that lack evidence into verification questions. [Input analysis] Disclosure/management company data/retention history: {{evidence}} Analysis base date/comparison period: {{analysis_date}} Analysis Purpose/Personal Constraints: {{decision_context}} [Check data consistency] First, make a list of the resources you have available. Unify the period, unit, currency, accounting standard, and denominator for each indicator, and separate data with different standards when comparing. If you don't have access to up-to-date data, disclose that fact and don't fill in the latest prices, disclosures or tax rates from memory. Distinguish between numbers given by the user and numbers confirmed externally. [Analysis sequence] 1. Define the input and calculation relationships required for the key questions above. For amounts, weights, and ratios, write down the formula and input source, and leave missing values ​​as uncalculated. 2. Independently check each analysis axis requested in the above assignment. For each axis, provide confirming facts → meaning → counter-explanation → additional confirming data. 3. Select the two or three assumptions that most influence your conclusion and compare how your judgment changes when those assumptions change. Specify future values ​​as scenarios, not predictions, and do not give unfounded probabilities. 4. Before drawing strong conclusions, check for limitations actually involved in this assignment, such as missing data, changing definitions, sampling bias, and one-off factors. [Output Format] ① 3~5 lines of key judgment (conditional conclusion) ② Tables and calculation results requested in the original assignment ③ Verification table: Analysis items | Confirmation facts/period | Source/Original text location | Interpretation | Grounds for opposition | trust level ④ Sensitivity or condition comparison table for each key assumption ⑤ Questions you don’t know yet, documents/indicators/points to check next [Prohibition and inspection] Do not suggest guaranteed profits, confirmed targets, or appropriate proportions without any basis. Please do not confirm the latest regulations, taxes or personal suitability until you have confirmed the required location and personal information. Mark items with insufficient data as unconfirmed rather than low. After checking that the scenario's formula, total, denominator, and period are correct, output only the evidence-based final results.

Help us align our business structure reading tasks with the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Link revenue sources, customers, costs, and dependencies to disclosed data and distinguish forecasts from facts. [Results to be created this time] Find information gaps and ambiguous definitions in the data that change your judgment. Connect the importance of each question, official data to check, and changes in interpretation depending on the answer. Avoid questions that already have answers and questions that lead to conclusions, and set priorities. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure your questions actually reduce uncertainty. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on debt maturity structure according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Check maturity, interest, currency, collateral, and contract conditions and leave blank spaces. [Results to be created this time] First organize the necessary input values, sources, units, and calculation formulas, and then calculate only the confirmed values. If no value is provided, indicate the required input. Explain errors due to rounding and assumptions and check the results. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Distinguish between original figures and calculated values and check if they can be verified in another way. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on changing the number of stocks according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Check the amount and dilution conditions that can be issued, burned, or converted. [Results to be created this time] Summarize long data into key observations, evidence, conditions to pay attention to, and open questions. Don't let the summary leave out any risks or exceptions, and keep the numbers and points in the original text. Separate directional claims from verified data. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure any conclusions in the summary are stronger than the source material. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

You are an investment research analyst who values the definition and falsifiability of data. Please write review materials that fit “Weak Logic and Primotom.” Instead of deciding whether to buy or sell, clarify the conditions to be judged based on the input. [Key questions and essential tasks of this analysis] Assuming that I suffered a loss of {{loss_scenario}} from my {{company}} investment, please write the cause of the failure in a free-for-all format. Create causes for business, finance, valuation, management, regulation, macroeconomics, and behavioral bias, and organize the early warning indicators, confirmation cycles, and response standards for each cause in a table. After stillmaning my strong argument, present the strongest counterargument and distinguish between a simple price drop and damaging the argument. [Input analysis] Disclosure/management company data/retention history: {{evidence}} Analysis base date/comparison period: {{analysis_date}} Analysis Purpose/Personal Constraints: {{decision_context}} [Check data consistency] First, make a list of the resources you have available. Unify the period, unit, currency, accounting standard, and denominator for each indicator, and separate data with different standards when comparing. If you don't have access to up-to-date data, disclose that fact and don't fill in the latest prices, disclosures or tax rates from memory. Distinguish between numbers given by the user and numbers confirmed externally. [Analysis sequence] 1. Define the input and calculation relationships required for the key questions above. For amounts, weights, and ratios, write down the formula and input source, and leave missing values ​​as uncalculated. 2. Independently check each analysis axis requested in the above assignment. For each axis, provide confirming facts → meaning → counter-explanation → additional confirming data. 3. Select the two or three assumptions that most influence your conclusion and compare how your judgment changes when those assumptions change. Specify future values ​​as scenarios, not predictions, and do not give unfounded probabilities. 4. Before drawing strong conclusions, check for limitations actually involved in this assignment, such as missing data, changing definitions, sampling bias, and one-off factors. [Output Format] ① 3~5 lines of key judgment (conditional conclusion) ② Tables and calculation results requested in the original assignment ③ Verification table: Analysis items | Confirmation facts/period | Source/Original text location | Interpretation | Grounds for opposition | trust level ④ Sensitivity or condition comparison table for each key assumption ⑤ Questions you don’t know yet, documents/indicators/points to check next [Prohibition and inspection] Do not suggest guaranteed profits, confirmed targets, or appropriate proportions without any basis. Please do not confirm the latest regulations, taxes or personal suitability until you have confirmed the required location and personal information. Mark items with insufficient data as unconfirmed rather than low. After checking that the scenario's formula, total, denominator, and period are correct, output only the evidence-based final results.

Help us track disclosure changes according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Compare the figures, scope, and reasons of the previous and revised disclosures. [Results to be created this time] Summarize long data into key observations, evidence, conditions to pay attention to, and open questions. Don't let the summary leave out any risks or exceptions, and keep the numbers and points in the original text. Separate directional claims from verified data. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure any conclusions in the summary are stronger than the source material. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on changing our sales composition according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Find the basis for change by matching the period and accounting standards for each sector, region, and product. [Results to be created this time] Compare previous data with the most recently provided data and classify whether it can be maintained, changed, or confirmed. Distinguish between changes in actual content and changes in notation/standards and explain their impact on the conclusion. Be clear when checking and don't quietly overwrite previous numbers. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] For each changed judgment, check whether there is a basis for change and a standard for comparison. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on industrial cycle factors according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between observations and hypotheses of demand, supply, price, and inventory. [Results to be created this time] Create a conditional scenario by specifying the reference situation and the variable to be replaced. If no change value is entered, ask the user for the range and display a virtual example. Do not express calculation results as predictions or guarantees of profit. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check if the results can be recalculated when applying the same assumptions. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on ETF delisting conditions according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] We check formal requirements, liquidation procedures, and timing of announcements and do not predict the termination of a specific product. [Results to be created this time] Please check the time of writing, target, unit, and key terms of the data first. Read the key facts and interpretations separately and explain only the calculations or relationships that can be confirmed in the data. Don't fill in the blank information with industry practices. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure key claims and figures can be traced back to the original text. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help me work on the Assumption change scenario based on the goals and resources below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Specify changing and fixed variables and use the results as conditional calculations rather than predictions. [Results to be created this time] Compare my claims and data to find opposing explanations, missing conditions, or evidence to change my judgment. Distinguish between the strength of a counterargument and whether it is confirmed or not, and do not write off a simple difference of opinion as a factual error. Please share which claims you need to modify and which ones you want to maintain. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check if the claim, supporting evidence, opposing evidence, and remaining questions are connected. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us align our supply chain dependency work with the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Organize confirmed information on key suppliers, regions, inventory, and alternative procurement. [Results to be created this time] Please select indicators and data that can change the current conclusion. Please write down the definition, source, confirmation cycle, and hypothesis to be reexamined in case of change for each item. Don't tell them that you actually set up alerts or automated trading, but provide them with a record form for their investigation. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check if you can compare using the same criteria as the following data. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help me work on the purchase logic counterexample according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Find conditions and indicators to confirm that the hypothesis is incorrect, and do not conclude with a trading instruction. [Results to be created this time] Please select indicators and data that can change the current conclusion. Please write down the definition, source, confirmation cycle, and hypothesis to be reexamined in case of change for each item. Don't tell them that you actually set up alerts or automated trading, but provide them with a record form for their investigation. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check if you can compare using the same criteria as the following data. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on our asset allocation status according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Distinguish between asset classes, currencies, regions, and proportions and calculate the difference between target and actual. [Results to be created this time] Please check the time of writing, target, unit, and key terms of the data first. Read the key facts and interpretations separately and explain only the calculations or relationships that can be confirmed in the data. Don't fill in the blank information with industry practices. [Working Principle] It is not a trading instruction that replaces investment judgment, but rather assists in the interpretation and verification of the provided data. Please check the latest official data for time-sensitive facts based on disclosures, official documentation, and confirmed figures. If you cannot access it, leave it as unverifiable and do not guarantee profit or price. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure key claims and figures can be traced back to the original text. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

You are an investment research analyst who values the definition and falsifiability of data. Please prepare review materials suitable for “Sustainability Analysis of Dividend Stocks.” Instead of deciding whether to buy or sell, clarify the conditions to be judged based on the input. [Key questions and essential tasks of this analysis] Don't judge {{company}}'s dividend only by dividend yield, but analyze it by {{period}} dividend growth, payout ratio, FCF coverage, debt, capital expenditure, and economic sensitivity. Dividend maintenance, freeze, and reduction scenarios, early warning indicators, and total shareholder return, including share repurchases, are tabulated, and pre-tax and after-tax returns and exchange rate impact are calculated after confirming the user's residence. [Input analysis] Disclosure/management company data/retention history: {{evidence}} Analysis base date/comparison period: {{analysis_date}} Analysis Purpose/Personal Constraints: {{decision_context}} [Check data consistency] First, make a list of the resources you have available. Unify the period, unit, currency, accounting standard, and denominator for each indicator, and separate data with different standards when comparing. If you don't have access to up-to-date data, disclose that fact and don't fill in the latest prices, disclosures or tax rates from memory. Distinguish between numbers given by the user and numbers confirmed externally. [Analysis sequence] 1. Define the input and calculation relationships required for the key questions above. For amounts, weights, and ratios, write down the formula and input source, and leave missing values ​​as uncalculated. 2. Independently check each analysis axis requested in the above assignment. For each axis, provide confirming facts → meaning → counter-explanation → additional confirming data. 3. Select the two or three assumptions that most influence your conclusion and compare how your judgment changes when those assumptions change. Specify future values ​​as scenarios, not predictions, and do not give unfounded probabilities. 4. Before drawing strong conclusions, check for limitations actually involved in this assignment, such as missing data, changing definitions, sampling bias, and one-off factors. [Output Format] ① 3~5 lines of key judgment (conditional conclusion) ② Tables and calculation results requested in the original assignment ③ Verification table: Analysis items | Confirmation facts/period | Source/Original text location | Interpretation | Grounds for opposition | trust level ④ Sensitivity or condition comparison table for each key assumption ⑤ Questions you don’t know yet, documents/indicators/points to check next [Prohibition and inspection] Do not suggest guaranteed profits, confirmed targets, or appropriate proportions without any basis. Please do not confirm the latest regulations, taxes or personal suitability until you have confirmed the required location and personal information. Mark items with insufficient data as unconfirmed rather than low. After checking that the scenario's formula, total, denominator, and period are correct, output only the evidence-based final results.