From your first idea to daily operations, plan your next step as a solo founder.

Please help us meet the scope of outsourcing requests according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Separate output, inspection standards, schedule, data, and scope of revision. [Results to be created this time] Distinguish between information that can be confirmed based on current data and information gaps that change the outcome. Write down the reasons for each question and the parts that vary depending on the answer, and suggest up to three questions to check first. Once you receive the answer, please update the agreed upon task summary. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check whether the question already has an answer in existing materials or is simply a question of preference. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help me work out my break-even assumptions based on the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] It shows the calculation and sensitivity of fixed costs, contribution margin per case, and required sales volume. [Results to be created this time] Select the key points that readers need to make decisions or take action from long materials and create a short version. Do not replace conditions, exceptions, or evidence to make a stronger claim. First, present a short result and distinguish between conditions that should not be omitted and parts that should be passed on as detailed information. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Check with the original text whether the key meanings, conditions, and figures are the same before and after the abbreviation. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Please help me work on the recommendation request method according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] We consider the time of confirmation of satisfaction and the burden of the request, and do not hide false reviews or compensation. [Results to be created this time] If there are alternatives provided, compare them based on the same criteria. If not, suggest two possible approaches based on the current data. Distinguish between appropriate situations, pros and cons, required data, and what to give up for each approach. Rather than saying that one is unconditionally better, please write down the basis for your choice based on the input conditions. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure that the comparison criteria and assumptions are applied equally to all alternatives. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on our target audience according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] It is segmented into roles, situations, and purchase occasions, and demand is not determined based on gender or age alone. [Results to be created this time] Distinguish between information that can be confirmed based on current data and information gaps that change the outcome. Write down the reasons for each question and the parts that vary depending on the answer, and suggest up to three questions to check first. Once you receive the answer, please update the agreed upon task summary. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check whether the question already has an answer in existing materials or is simply a question of preference. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on our target audience according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] It is segmented into roles, situations, and purchase occasions, and demand is not determined based on gender or age alone. [Results to be created this time] Compare the data with previous feedback, organize changes to be reflected, and write a revised version. For conflicting feedback, explain the options based on purpose and reader criteria. Briefly compare what was kept, what was changed, and the reason for the change, and do not add new facts. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure previously confirmed conditions are preserved and requested feedback is reflected. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on our target audience according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] It is segmented into roles, situations, and purchase occasions, and demand is not determined based on gender or age alone. [Results to be created this time] Figure out the purpose and audience first, and then write the actual draft starting from the parts that contain the necessary information. Change the flow of background, key points, evidence, and next actions to fit the topic, and mark parts with missing data as requiring confirmation. The results are divided into a draft that can be edited immediately and a remaining verification question. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure all the facts and figures in your draft match the input and allow the reader to know what to do next. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work through the customer onboarding process according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Identify the steps leading up to the first experience of value and reasons for stopping. [Results to be created this time] Compare the data with previous feedback, organize changes to be reflected, and write a revised version. For conflicting feedback, explain the options based on purpose and reader criteria. Briefly compare what was kept, what was changed, and the reason for the change, and do not add new facts. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure previously confirmed conditions are preserved and requested feedback is reflected. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

You are a planner who organizes complex requirements into actionable decision boundaries. Please review problem {{goal}}, data {{material}}, conditions {{constraints}}, and existing records {{history}}. If the person who set the condition or the reason for application is missing and it affects the classification, ask a maximum of 3 key questions. Classify each requirement into ‘constraints that cannot be changed, conditions that can be negotiated, preferences, and premises that must be confirmed.’ The result is ‘condition | Category | Evidence or Source | Person/role to check | Please fill out the ‘Influence on Choice’ table. Don't judge it as a necessary condition just because the expression is strong, and add confirmation questions to items whose classification is unclear. Find conditions that conflict with each other and explain which combination causes the problem. Compare the benefits and burdens of the two options that require minimal change for each conflict. At the end, present no more than 5 questions in order of importance, and link what alternatives are possible depending on the answers. The completed deliverable is a short decision scope document with three parts: agreed essentials / terms to be negotiated / items to check before decision. Planning reference: @fish__.bread https://www.threads.com/@fish__.bread/post/DdgpJIhgE6N Create a prompt: Prompthere

Help us work out the pre-launch checklist according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Core flows, support, settlement, documentation, and failure response are inspected in line with the actual scope of provision. [Results to be created this time] Compare the initial goal and actual results and share good choices, stuck points, and lack of evidence. Instead of criticizing the judgment at the time based solely on the results, choose no more than two hypotheses to change. Please suggest indicators to maintain, change, and observe in the next attempt. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure you have concrete data to compare improvements to in the next attempt. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help with manual service experimentation according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Before automation, determine the value to be provided, operating time, and metrics to be recorded. [Results to be created this time] Compare the data with previous feedback, organize changes to be reflected, and write a revised version. For conflicting feedback, explain the options based on purpose and reader criteria. Briefly compare what was kept, what was changed, and the reason for the change, and do not add new facts. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure previously confirmed conditions are preserved and requested feedback is reflected. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on the business indicator dashboard according to the goals and data below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Define calculation formula, source, cycle, responsibility, and action in case of abnormality for each indicator. [Results to be created this time] Create a handover document focusing on the current status, what has already been decided, open questions, next actions, and data location. For the person in charge and the deadline, only write what is provided and leave the undecided ones as is. Leave the necessary context so that people who haven't read the original can take the first step. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure recipients know what to look for, where to look, and what to do next. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help you work on your first sales conversation by aligning it with the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Design the conversation based on identifying the partner's problem, determining suitability, and next action. [Results to be created this time] Distinguish between information that can be confirmed based on current data and information gaps that change the outcome. Write down the reasons for each question and the parts that vary depending on the answer, and suggest up to three questions to check first. Once you receive the answer, please update the agreed upon task summary. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Please check whether the question already has an answer in existing materials or is simply a question of preference. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on industry entry barriers according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Barriers in terms of technology, operations, distribution, and trust are distinguished, and legal requirements are left as items to be checked. [Results to be created this time] Compare the initial goal and actual results and share good choices, stuck points, and lack of evidence. Instead of criticizing the judgment at the time based solely on the results, choose no more than two hypotheses to change. Please suggest indicators to maintain, change, and observe in the next attempt. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure you have concrete data to compare improvements to in the next attempt. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.

Help us work on customer problem hypotheses according to the goals and materials below. [input] Goals and usage situations: {{goal}} Resources to review: {{source}} Conditions and Constraints: {{constraints}} Previous attempts and records: {{history}} [Key points to check in this topic] Inconvenience, current alternative, frequency of occurrence, and willingness to pay are divided into observation and hypothesis. [Results to be created this time] If there are alternatives provided, compare them based on the same criteria. If not, suggest two possible approaches based on the current data. Distinguish between appropriate situations, pros and cons, required data, and what to give up for each approach. Rather than saying that one is unconditionally better, please write down the basis for your choice based on the input conditions. [Working Principle] Distinguish between observed facts and business hypotheses to be tested. Do not fill in sales, demand, and costs arbitrarily, but leave actual basis and calculation conditions. Consider the resource constraints of your implementation. If there is no input that will change the results, ask only the necessary questions first and proceed with the parts that can be confirmed with data. [Completion criteria] Make sure that the comparison criteria and assumptions are applied equally to all alternatives. Distinguish between the basis for the outcome, remaining uncertainties, and next actions, and mark only what has actually been confirmed as complete.